JSngry Posted Sunday at 11:48 PM Report Posted Sunday at 11:48 PM https://www.mercurynews.com/2025/05/17/review-diana-krall-concert-tour-mountain-winery-saratoga/ I mean, I'm not a big fan or anything, but truth is truth! Quote
JSngry Posted yesterday at 12:59 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 12:59 AM Sorry about that.. it was in my Google news feed and didn't have a paywall for me. I hate paywalls. Quote
rostasi Posted yesterday at 01:01 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:01 AM That's OK. We all have these different setups. It happened to me, so I thought maybe it may happen elsewhere. Quote
Dan Gould Posted yesterday at 01:32 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:32 AM Is it really any surprise given the way she was promoted and who she is married to? I'd like to know if the writer makes any effort to explain to people what jazz artists do and why there are these boring interminable instrumentals that might reward close listening if the complainers had the slightest ability to listen closely. Quote
dicky Posted yesterday at 01:54 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:54 AM Your title and the review are somewhat at odds. People left. Why? Who knows. The venue appears to have a capacity of 2500. If half the audience split that's still pretty impressive. I'm no Krall fan. But she's a gateway artist. She can play & a certain percentage of her fans will ultimately discover musicians we all admire. Ain't nothing wrong with that. Her husband of now 20+ years, Elvis Costello, recorded w/ Ray Brown as early as 1986. I presume a portion of her audience stems from him. Quote
JSngry Posted yesterday at 01:56 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 01:56 AM 24 minutes ago, Dan Gould said: Is it really any surprise given the way she was promoted and who she is married to? I'd like to know if the writer makes any effort to explain to people what jazz artists do and why there are these boring interminable instrumentals that might reward close listening if the complainers had the slightest ability to listen closely. He was (sorta) reviewing a show, not teaching a Music Appreciation class. 4 minutes ago, dicky said: Your title and the review are somewhat at odds. Not my title. That was the headline of the review, copied and pasted verbatim. Quote
dicky Posted yesterday at 02:08 AM Report Posted yesterday at 02:08 AM Not my title. That was the headline of the review, copied and pasted verbatim. First line of the review. My apologies for missing that. Quote
sambrasa Posted yesterday at 02:19 AM Report Posted yesterday at 02:19 AM 23 minutes ago, dicky said: Your title and the review are somewhat at odds. People left. Why? Who knows. The venue appears to have a capacity of 2500. If half the audience split that's still pretty impressive. I'm no Krall fan. But she's a gateway artist. She can play & a certain percentage of her fans will ultimately discover musicians we all admire. Ain't nothing wrong with that. Her husband of now 20+ years, Elvis Costello, recorded w/ Ray Brown as early as 1986. I presume a portion of her audience stems from him. I haven't heard much from Elvis Costello, but the album he did with Bill Frisell in 1999, The Sweetest Punch, is excellent. Quote
Pim Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago I’ve read some reviews here and there on the internet by attenders of several gigs that her latest concerts are not good. Some say she seems to be drunk or intoxicated forgetting lyrics and tunes to play, mumbling instead of singing. I don’t know. I’m no fan but hope she’s okay. Quote
Dan Gould Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 11 hours ago, JSngry said: He was (sorta) reviewing a show, not teaching a Music Appreciation class. From the article: I’ve come to that conclusion based on years of hearing people grumble at her concerts about the long improvisational instrumental portions, a sentiment that has been underscored by the emails I’ve received from disappointed concert-goers who disagree with my typically positive assessment of Krall’s live performances. In all of the above cases, they seem to want a stronger focus on the vocals, which is quite understandable given how great Krall is on the microphone. And they want her to sing in a more straightforward singer-songwriter/pop fashion, instead of using her voice as a jazz instrument. He is speaking to people and receiving emails about how terrible it is that she plays jazz at her jazz shows. That's why I asked if he ever tells people that's what she is and does. Quote
Big Beat Steve Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 34 minutes ago, Dan Gould said: In all of the above cases, they seem to want a stronger focus on the vocals, which is quite understandable given how great Krall is on the microphone. And they want her to sing in a more straightforward singer-songwriter/pop fashion, instead of using her voice as a jazz instrument. He is speaking to people and receiving emails about how terrible it is that she plays jazz at her jazz shows. That's why I asked if he ever tells people that's what she is and does. Not that I've ever been overwhelmed by what I've heard by Diana Krall, but this ... It must be frustrating if that large a part of the audience is THAT clueless ... Or maybe her live appearances are not targeted enough to attract an audience that is at least passably aware (and appreciative) of what jazz is? Quote
Dan Gould Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago 45 minutes ago, Big Beat Steve said: Not that I've ever been overwhelmed by what I've heard by Diana Krall, but this ... It must be frustrating if that large a part of the audience is THAT clueless ... Or maybe her live appearances are not targeted enough to attract an audience that is at least passably aware (and appreciative) of what jazz is? The hazards of becoming a pop star ... I guess Norah Jones doesn't suffer this problem because she keeps the jazz content minimal to non-existent? She does have jazz chops from what I have heard (I think). Quote
mr jazz Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago Ok vocalist, pretty good player but I can generally think of an artist who does a better version of whatever cover she is doing. Quote
JSngry Posted 16 hours ago Author Report Posted 16 hours ago 1 hour ago, Dan Gould said: From the article: I’ve come to that conclusion based on years of hearing people grumble at her concerts about the long improvisational instrumental portions, a sentiment that has been underscored by the emails I’ve received from disappointed concert-goers who disagree with my typically positive assessment of Krall’s live performances. In all of the above cases, they seem to want a stronger focus on the vocals, which is quite understandable given how great Krall is on the microphone. And they want her to sing in a more straightforward singer-songwriter/pop fashion, instead of using her voice as a jazz instrument. He is speaking to people and receiving emails about how terrible it is that she plays jazz at her jazz shows. That's why I asked if he ever tells people that's what she is and does. I don't have access to his emails. I would hope that he does 20 minutes ago, Dan Gould said: The hazards of becoming a pop star ... I guess Norah Jones doesn't suffer this problem because she keeps the jazz content minimal to non-existent? She does have jazz chops from what I have heard (I think). Pop star? What was her big hit? Sure, she was marketed with glamor and married a rock star, but she herself? I doubt she merits "celebrity", much less "pop star". Quote
Rabshakeh Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago Isn't this a standard issue for jazz vocalists though? One that affected Sarah Vaughan and Ella Fitzgerald? Quote
JSngry Posted 16 hours ago Author Report Posted 16 hours ago Sarahhired a piano player. So did Carmen McRae. Ella was a big band singer. Shirley Horn defended her position quite nicely. Quote
Rabshakeh Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago What I mean is that normie fans of jazz vocalists not enjoying jazz vocals has a pedigree that could get its own category at Crufts. Quote
clifford_thornton Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago Very strange indeed. I never really cared for/about her, but agree that the jazz content is part of the deal! Quote
Dan Gould Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 1 hour ago, JSngry said: I don't have access to his emails. I would hope that he does Pop star? What was her big hit? Sure, she was marketed with glamor and married a rock star, but she herself? I doubt she merits "celebrity", much less "pop star". "Star" was a poor choice of words but she was marketed as modern day singer of pop & standards ... to quote from that article And they want her to sing in a more straightforward singer-songwriter/pop fashion, instead of using her voice as a jazz instrument. Quote
JSngry Posted 15 hours ago Author Report Posted 15 hours ago Up to a point....but never fully. They always (at her insurance IIRC) made room for her piano I'm a bit surprised that she's not had her movie song moment. Or has she! I'd not be the one to know that. Quote
mikeweil Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 2 hours ago, Rabshakeh said: Isn't this a standard issue for jazz vocalists though? One that affected Sarah Vaughan and Ella Fitzgerald? My thoughts, too. But as a singer you always work at the broad line between jazz and so-called popular music. It is not much better in classical music. How many can remember a melody without words, or even memorize a solo? Quote
Niko Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago I also read a bit through online reviews and I find it hard to decide whom to blame... yes, some solos by sidemen are to be expected in jazz... but some reviewers complain about ridiculously extensive features for the bassist and the drummer... now, I would actually need to see it myself to judge - but I do agree that there is a line here that can be crossed even from a jazz fan's perspective... good for the bassist and the drummer, but if it's the leaders laziness rather than artistic reasons that motivate those solos... then again, in the reviewed concert she had a pianist and a guitar player with her as well so there should have been enough variation Quote
JSngry Posted 11 hours ago Author Report Posted 11 hours ago It's supposedly a REALLY good paying gigs and all of those guys get plenty of work elsewhere. They're excellent players, so it's not like there's a drop in quality, and hey, the feel appreciated past the money. Not all singers gigs are like that. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.