Big Beat Steve Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, Brad said: This is mostly a European concept. I do not know if it has been adopted by the US courts. So where DID the court ruling occur that Clifford_Thornton alluded to? 🤨 Quote
bertrand Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago I was being facetious of course, but seeing these kind of collectors' prices when the artists were barely making a living is depressing. That True Blue price would have been a little under $700 in 1960. I doubt Tina made that much from sales of the LP in his lifetime. Quote
Brad Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 10 hours ago, Big Beat Steve said: So where DID the court ruling occur that Clifford_Thornton alluded to? 🤨 Unless I missed it, I didn’t see Clifford mention a specific lawsuit. Quote
JSngry Posted 2 minutes ago Report Posted 2 minutes ago Remember how The Rhythm & Blues Foundation mounted legal actions that resulted in some of the 50s greats getting paid respectable amounts for unpaid back royalties? But it seems like that would be apples and pears to compare crooked record companies and bad faith contracts to shrewd art buyers/investors, no? Unless, again, there was something in the original terms of sale. Maybe those guys need a union. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.