Ken Dryden Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 This week I received two shipments on back to back days from The Lost Recordings, though I only ordered one copy of each release. I contacted them and asked for their FedEx number, and they responded that I would have to prepay to return it and they would credit me on a future order or refund the shipping charge on my credit card. There are several issues I have with this reply. One is I had to supply a new box, neither one was in any shape to be reused, two, I seem to be taking the risk in case the returned package is lost or stolen and I get stuck filing insurance claims. I am tempted to reject their solution and ask for a better one, like my getting an estimate from FedEx, ask them to refund my credit card that amount, then I will ship the box. How would you reply to this situation? Quote
Stompin at the Savoy Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 You should not be responsible or have to pay extra for an item they shipped by mistake. How to resolve it depends partially on the amount. Big amount I guess be a mensch and try to figure out some equitable way to send it back without you being out of pocket. Less than $50 or something - in my opinion they should just eat it. Quote
Ken Dryden Posted 21 hours ago Author Report Posted 21 hours ago I stopped by FedEx today and learned it would cost nearly $290 to return this duplicate order to this French label. Looks like I am stuck with them at their expense. I am not risking the combination of the USPS and French mail at my expense. Quote
Stompin at the Savoy Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago Maybe advise them it's available any time they want to pick it up! Quote
felser Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago I would put to them that it's their mistake, that you are doing them a solid by offering to return the stuff, that they need to take responsibility for the cost and logistics of the arrangements if they want it back, and that you need a solution in x number of days. Quote
clifford_thornton Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago Yeah, they screwed up and need to either give you a prepaid shipping label or eat the mistake. And you can sell us the duplicates ! Quote
felser Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 2 hours ago, clifford_thornton said: And you can sell us the duplicates ! I thought about that, but chose to not write it 😀. Quote
Ken Dryden Posted 12 hours ago Author Report Posted 12 hours ago I will give them time to respond, then I will sell the duplicates and forward them the net money. Quote
felser Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago 41 minutes ago, Ken Dryden said: I will give them time to respond, then I will sell the duplicates and forward them the net money. Very kind of you to do that for them. Quote
Kevin Bresnahan Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago I don’t know why you feel obligated to send them the money after you sell it. They’re a fancy bootleg label anyway. They release stuff outside the EU PD date (1962) and don’t license from the artists… at least that’s what Stan Getz’s estate has said. Quote
paulfromcamden Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Kevin Bresnahan said: I don’t know why you feel obligated to send them the money after you sell it. They’re a fancy bootleg label anyway. They release stuff outside the EU PD date (1962) and don’t license from the artists… at least that’s what Stan Getz’s estate has said. Interesting - though they've also issued later stuff. Monk in 67, Cannonball in 72. Academic for me as I don't have the budget for £60 Coltrane LPs. Also... $290 to ship some records to France! Ouch!! Edited 2 hours ago by paulfromcamden Quote
clifford_thornton Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago I'd be interested in the Coltrane. I'm sure a bunch of us would. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.