Quoting myself here. I see that a few of you did not honor my request. Either way... I stand by my opinion here. I'm now listening to Monk's solo on "Locomotive". Rouse plays well here, for me. Fluid, sometimes smooth, sometimes hardened soul, often bebop, and it serves the leader well with an easy transition into his turn. Perhaps I'm over-simplifying in y'all's world, but there it is. Whether or not Rouse was pushing the limits of Monk's music is irrelevant for me. Apparently, whether or not Rouse was pushing the limits of Monk's music was irrelevant for Monk as well.
We can agree that Monk knew his own music? Portable or not, Monk chose Rouse for studio dates as well. Surely he had his pick of musicians for those Columbia dates. I can't imagine he chose Rouse because he was just available to record all the days that Monk was scheduled with Columbia.
If we are dividing work by master, tradesman, and novice and nothing but master is worth our time, no one would take the time to read your work. No offense please, but your stance on criticism is just hypocrisy. Where do you rate yourself? 1, 2, or 5?