<br /><br />Maybe what some seem to have reservations about here is why grabbing a survival opportunity so often has to go at the price of shortchanging your fellow MUSICIANS. Credit to whom credit is due seems to be a line of thinking here and I cannot say I do NOT find that understandable ...<br /><br /><br />I'm a big believer in credit where credit is due myself, but that is not what the Corporate Music Industry is built on. It's the same as any other corporate industry - the many do the work, the few organize the work, and the fewer still get the glory and the big bucks. Same as it ever was.<br /><br />The Dirty Little Secret in jazz is that most people don't really want to be <b>hugely </b>successful. They see what it takes and say, "uhhhhh....no thanks", and then set about to get as far along as they can be doing what they feel is right (enough). Which is all good (best, actually, imo), but...don't bitch about not ever making it "really big", and don't be shocked and surprised when the people who do want to be really big go ahead and do the things that lead to just that.<br /><br />And this - if you see somebody who really is a Nice Guy who has also made it really big, you can almost bet your life that somewhere, at some point, they had somebody acting on their behalf to do what it took.<br /><br />Otherwise, you either have an "industry" and all that comes with it or you don't. C'est la vie.<br /><br /><br /><br />
I don't necessarily take this as BS. I don't know that much about the music world, but take all of the music references out of this thought and you have pretty well explained every other work situation I have ever been in.