Actually, what made me think about this for some time is that it seems like every time any 60's Blue Note album is mentioned, people are jumping on and declaring it one of the great masterpieces of all time, regardless of title. I'm trying to stimulate people, especially some of the newer/younger guys, to think/listen through some of this. I mean, I love the Blue Note sound, but not every title is among the greatest. If there are 500 of them, then 100 of those rank in the bottom 20%. (BTW, I think 'Speak No Evil' is awesome).
Basically, I agree that the Blue Note label tends to get overhyped. We've been over that a dozen times, going back to threads on the board hosted by the label in question. It used to suprise me how many members of the BNBB seemed virtually unaware of the Fantasy catalog, for example. At any rate, all of this is highly subjective. Everybody has their own tastes, and their own personal favorite artists and recordings. We all know (we've had it beaten into our brains ) that Rooster loves Andrew Hill and the "progressive" post-bop era. I'm sort of the opposite. I much prefer Benny Golson over Wayne Shorter (as a player as well as a composer). "Cornbread" includes "Ceora", and that alone makes it indispensible to me. "Page One"? Indispensible to me, for "Blue Bossa", "La Mesha", and the chemistry between Henderson and Dorham. "GO"? Hey, it's Dexter, you MF's.
Bottom line- I suspect that nothing will come of this discussion. Seriously, I'm all for newer/younger jazz fans being encouraged to think for themselves (don't pay any attention to those AMG reviews... that's my motto).