Like I said above - n the last few years, I have been able to divide jazz into two main categories - stuff I like and stuff I don't like.
I just got sick and tired of listening to something and analyzing it as to who is playing, what influences do I hear, is it a rip off or too derivative, is it too poppish or to danceable, does it groove enough or too much etc etc etc. As an entrant into jazz in the fusion focused 70s, I dig a lot of the electronic stuff I hear by Truffaz, Hargrove, Stefon Harris. I'm so sick of having the stuff compared to Miles I think I'm gonna I don't care - it grooves and it please me so I listen to it. Same with the early 70s BN stuff, Pat Metheny, John Scofield and a lot more guys who on various boards over the years have been analyzed to death over whether they're jazz or not or creative or not or their technique is good or not. I've been able to enjoy awhole lot more music than I ever thought possible - yes even the 70s Donald Byrds. I dig 'em for what they are even though when they came out when I was a fusion head, I thought he was the biggest sellout going. Now I listen to them and think of one thing - they're fun. Sometimes that's enough.