Whoa. Hold it right there. "Attacking?" Come on, Chris; you've seen Dan "attack" before, and this ain't it. He's just pointing out that, without more information, and knowledge of mistreatment, your attacking Max's family should be questioned. I agree. At some point in the development of Alzheimer's, a family can't take care of the patient, and to assume that they are evil because they've tried and given up and tried to find professional help for him is really cruel and outdated. Some of us have been there, and it's not easy on anyone. If you have proof that the man is being mistreated, that's different, but saying he ought to be at home without more information as to how far the disease has progressed, etc., just shows a lack of knowledge about the disease and it's ramifications.