Big Beat Steve

And a useful detail to add to the session details in the liner notes of the Baron Mingus Uptown CD. (Check ... done ... ) I remember after I bought the "King Richard" LP (Fresh Sound reissue) in the early 2000s it took me a while and several spins to warm up to it. Time to relisten now ... "The Herdsmen Play Paris" on Fantasy.

Exhausted or not - thanks very much, sgcim, for bringing up the exact quote. I did not remember the exact context either (I read the Twardzik bio after it came out but have only browsed certain sections here and there since) but now see why it did not strike me as an oddity or a mistake at the time. I must have intuitively understood it in the sense of "hardcore" or "dyed in the wool" (which made perfect sense to me, particularly if you consider that figurative/illustrative terms are coined in colloquial lingo all the time). Interesting to see that it does seem to have been a Zieffian creation and not a mixup after all.

Somehow I have a hunch this Jack Chambers pet peeve might well turn into a(nother?) variation on the "take your turn at blasting Wynton Marsalis and you can't go wrong" theme. (I.e. "the target is out there and merits it - so let him have it ...") Cases of authors trying to convey that they are on the inside of what they write about but on closer examination (by those readers passably in the know) are not aren't that rare. I'd guess if every attentive and knowledgeable reader got started on cases like this they would find a lot to quibble about in books by any number of authors and/or historians, particuarly in "our" field of music books ... Including some details that others might rate as minor errors but that might just as well undermine the reader's confidence in the author(s) once you realize that these authors apparently are liable to commit gross factual errors as soon as they stray (even minimally) off the core of their subject matter. Even if this may only be due to carelessness (which isn't the best indicator to confirm the author's diligence either) And as for this "bone-fried" thing, it may well have been a mishap (but was it the author or some clueless typist who typed a spoken text, with the goof escaping subsequent proofreading?) but OTOH isn't it an amusing yet illustrative and understandable (to me, anyway) linguistic creation? And would it be the first case of an author making up a new term ?? A chance online search revealed, BTW, that this "bone-fried" had already been a "bone" 😁 of contention on THIS forum back in 2009 (FOURTEEN years ago! What's the fuss about through all these years?) I've seen rather more blatant errors in written documents throughout my professional life, not to mention in my leisure readings (wonder what those inheriting my library one day will think of some of my handwritten corrections in some of my books - and therefore of me ). Coming to think of it, I might well have to pay closer attention during my future readings and/or re-check what I've annotated in the past (just because it baffled and/or grated me at that particular reading moment) - if only to put into perspective your assertion of "funniest typos ever". At any rate, I wonder what else there is out there to correct in published books that despite these flaws are of merit anyway. To name just one example, there's one author whose books on music matters and whom himself I greatly admire for his knowledge, in-depth analysis and writing style but who could do a lot worse than to at long last take note that there IS in fact a difference between "then" and "than". So ...?

I had spontaneously thought of "Ascenseur pour l'Echafaud" (Lift To The Scaffold) too but on second thought I wouldn't be so sure. I think our own impressions are severely biased by our jazz knowledge. French "Film Noir" is a genre to itself, and this movie is a key opus within that genre. I doubt that overall there are all that many cinéastes (particularly in continental Europe and its country of origin, in particular) who, when this film is evoked, think "Miles Davis" first and NOT "Louis Malle" or "Jeanne Moreau". If you want to go down that route, I think that Art Blakey's Jazz Messengers' score to "Des Femmes Disparaissent" (literally: "Women Disappear") as part of the Jazz Messengers' discography is a more likely candidate. Particularly since that movie was considered more of a sensationalist "B movie" of doubtful eternal artistic merits at the time. Which is borne out by the "evocative" period titles of this movie in other languages: English: The Road to Shame German: Blonde Fracht und schwarze Teufel (Blonde Freight and Black Devils) Italian: I Vampiri Del Sesso (The Vampires of Sex) Spanish: Vampiros Del Amor (Vampires of Love) Nuff said? Next one up in that corner of the film world that I'd suggest to see if it is the movie or the score that is remembered best today: "Les Liaisons Dangereuses" (the film by Vadim, not that recent TV soap!). Less clear-cut than "Ascenseur Pour L'Echafaud" IMO but open to debate ...

Congratulations on a certainly unforgettable evening!

I just checked this online. To the best of my knowledge, all of this material seems to have been reissued elsewhere before in the not too distant past before this CD was released (e.g. on Onyx/Xanadu LPs and on Savoy twofers). Like others in that CD series, you get a lot of material but since the leaders often were not the artist in whose name the CD was released you later find, upon checking your collection, that you already have most or even all of it on other records. BTW, there IS one other that so far has not been mentioned: "The Four Brothers - Together Again!" (RCA, rec. 11 Feb. 1957) This was Serge Chaloff's final recording date. Any opinions on this by those thoroughly familiar with it? I need to relisten to it to get an opinion again, but from what I remember from period reviews Chaloff must have been in great form and, maybe sensing his end was drawing closer, put everything in this date.

At the risk of this turning into yet another "in-due-course-every-record-by-the-subject-on-hand-will-be-named" thread , I'd give a big plug for the "Boston Blow-Up" LP (Capitol, 1954) as well. Its impact on me was as immediate as the Blue Serge LP, even more so (at least on first listening) than the Fable of Mable. I'd second the props for the Boston 1950 CD on Uptown in the opening post, and I suppose the SECOND Uptown CD (Rock Island February 1953) needs no added recomendations either.

Digging up this thread for a reason .... I continued digging through the jazz collection that a local record shop got in not long ago (which is where I scored the Complete Keynote Collection box set, as reported elsewhere ), and while digging I noticed the previous owner must have been an Ellington completist (of sorts). And among the records where you start wondering "How many Ellington vinyl does any one man need, let alone how many Ellington LPs can a shop shift within any reasonable time span?" there sit lots and lots of the "D.E.T.S." LPs with their generic white covers (that remind you of the Meritt label, paper inserts and all - probably they came from the same stable (Jerry Valburn?)). It may not be the complete run of the 48 (or so) LPs but certainly several dozen. Priced at 2.50 EUR each. Which looks like a steal. Now my question: Even at that price and considering that storage space isn't unlimited , how much of an Ellington fetishist would one have to be to shell out for this series? FTR, although Duke Ellington is not really at the top of my listening habits I already own quite a few of his recordings on vinyl, including the entire "Complete RCA" series on French RCA, the entire Columbia series reissued by CBS in the 70s, the "Brunswick Recordings" of the early 30s, some Musicrafts, a fair amount of 40s transcriptions (including all 5 "Uncollected" LPs), the Fargo, ND 1940 date, as well as assorted other non-commercial 40s and early 50s recordings - plus a cross-section of his later works up to the early 60s. So I am wondering where to reasonably draw a line ...

No ... But if I ever came across a copy at a good price I'd jump on it! This may be totally gimmicky but it sounds like a fun idea.

If it IS a good price and basically (at least in a wider sense) fits your style tastes, why not just file it in the "Obscurities and oddities" corner of your jazz collection? That's what I would tell myself as a "purchase decision-maker" 😉 if an item like that came my way at a price at which anyone would be able to take chances.

Went on a crate-digging excursion at our local #1 record store today, pulled a fair handful of Swing LPs from the (2.50 EUR) Special Offer bin at the entrance, and upon entering the shop the "resident sales clerk" told me "There is more where these came from" and pointed me to three more huge Special offer crates full of (as he described it) "Swing and Oldtime Jazz". Actually it was mostly Swing and some Bop and Cool, but this was only the tip of the iceberg of a huge collection they had just gotten in stock, so more visits are due later. Just as I had started on these crates he approached me with another item from the same collection, "Would you be interested in this too? Specially priced to sell ..." Whew ... the Japanese "Complete Keynote Collection" LP box set in excellent condition, complete with booklet, picture folio and the Tristano 45 😲 - priced at 75 EUR, which works out at something like 3.50 EUR per LP. And ready to haul away - no shipping fees ... Not the worst deal in the world ... Would I have been able to say No to that proposition? Well, NO ... So it looks like my Fresh Sound CD Keynote box set will be relegated to convenience listening when no alternate takes are desired or will (in part) go into the car to feed the car player. FWIW, I guess they priced it like that because regardless of how desirable the Keynotes are, objectively speaking, they knew this is not the fare that their typical jazz vinyl-buying customers usually weaned on Hard Bop, Jazz Rock, Fusion or Soul Jazz would easily spring for, so it would likely have sat for quite a while ...

Not being a beer drinker at all, I had to look up what IPA exactly is. I understand the problem, though of course taste-wise I do not have an opinion. But ... no more airplay for this one, then?

Yes, exactly. When leafing through this catalog I was surprised to see how many of the Decca/Coral jazz items listed there had indeed been part of the reissue programs I mentioned. Some that were not (but that over time I've obtained as originals, though not because they were on Coral, of course ) included the Dick Marx/Johnny Frigo LPs, Eddie Costa's "Guys And Dolls Like Vibes", the "Jazz Best Coast" V.A. LP and Al Jazzbo Collins' "East Coast Jazz Scene" - and (as R&B/R'n'R/mainstream Swing borderline items) the Alan Freed Orchestra LPs.

Seeing that electric vehicles (EVs) are slated (by politics etc.) to eventually replace internation combustion-engine cars, I wonder when motorbikes will (mandatorily?) be ordered to be replaced by e-bikes?

Eartlier this week (while the forum was down for some reason) I browsed through a Feb. 1959 copy of the "Jazz'n'Pops" catalog (some kind of "Schwann", it seems) and checked out the Decca acts. I can do a more detailed list if you want me to but the gist is: Among those in print at that time that were on Decca (not counting Coral this time) and had a sizable number of LPs on that label, in what rated as "pop" with the editors of that reference book you were stuck unless you had a liking for Louis Armstrong, Bing Crosby, Sammy Davis Jr., the Jack Pleis Orch. and a small handful of others. Other labels (particularly the ones you mentioend) indeed were far more frequent across the entire stylistic board. Checking the jazz section I found that indeed a large part of what was on Decca and Coral in the 50s had been covered by reissues on German MCA in the 70s and Fresh Sound and Jasmine in the 80s. So few items/artists were really scarce (but you had to look actively for them). BTW, as for Leith Stevens, another item I'd give a plug is his (expanded) soundtrack version of "The Wild One". A friend had an original Decca LP which I dubbed on cassette in the 80s (as he would not part with his copy, though he was far more into R'n'R) and I was very pleased when I found a copy of the Fresh Sound reissue years later.

Unless you compile one yourself I think it is going to be difficult to find one with a MINIMUM of the jive numbers. Why would any compiler deprive himself of the ESSENCE of the Cab Calloway band from that period when jazz meant entertainment and dancing above all? So ... for your specific question I'd sugest you search for a Chu Berry compilation that features a maximum of his feature tracks with the Cab Calloway band. There were a couple of vinyls of that kind and their contents may have been re-reissued "as is" somewhere in the CD era. One was a CBS reissue billed to Chu Berry and His Stompy Stevedores (with one of the two sides featuring Cab Calloway Orchestra recordings) which had several repressings, and another one was "Chu Berry Featured with Cab Calloway - "Penguin Swing" on Jazz Archives JA-8. But even there the Cab Calloway jive vocals aren't totally absent.

Very nice. But a pity they did not include the 5000 series.

IMO definitely yes.

You mean, the masters were destroyed then, so this may have completely nixed any incentive on Universal's part for reissues? I agree that even among the majors Decca was not at the forefront of jazz with its 50s catalog but there were interesting items. Though I tend to lump in Coral with Decca when thinking of the Decca catalog, two specific Decca items I'd single out are these: https://www.discogs.com/de/master/569863-Various-Das-Is-Jazz https://www.discogs.com/de/release/10002630-Kurt-Edelhagen-And-His-Orchestra-Jazz-From-Germany My appreciation may also be so because it was hard work obtaining the "Jazz From Germany" LP. I had won an eBay auction in 2000 or 2001 for this item (VG++) but due to the clueless (non-)packaging by the hick from the US sticks seller (sorry to put it that way) it arrived halfway broken through. Quite a shock because at that time it would have been anybody's guess when you'd be able to get your hands on another copy. A couple of years later I scored another copy from the US at a good price (which this time arrived safely) and to make up, this second copy turned out to be a first pressing with the black label (whereas the first one that had arrived cracked had the rainbow Decca label which AFAIK makes it a somewhat later - early 60s? - pressing, though the covers are 100% identical). And like I said, MCA reissued a lot of "Decca jazz" in Europe in the 70s (most of it originally on Coral, of course), Fresh Sound did a few more in the 80s, so the ground was covered at that time to some extent as far as availablity of the music itself was concerned.

Considering everything (from the 50s when not all musical styles were primarily geared towards LPs yet) I think so too. Another indicator: I just checked my copy of an "Al Smith's House of Jazz " catalog (dating from sometime in 1953 and arranged by label in its contents of jazz and more or less jazz-related LPs), and it has the following (approximate) numbers of pages allocated to the labels mentioned here: Decca - 2 p. Coral - not quite 1 p. US Brunswick - not quite 2 p. but OTOH ... Capitol - 6 p. Columbia - 11 p. RCA Victor - 5 p. (Liberty wasn't in the running yet) So could it be that this explains that to some degree?

An interesting question - one that I've been wondering about (thinking of the jazz or jazz-ish catalog) recently too ... BUT .... when you say "Decca", do you lump in "Coral" along with Decca or do you draw a clear line between the two? I know over here Coral and Brunswick (ie. European Decca) releases from the 50s (that are of interest to me) do come up regularly, and who is on which label is rather interchangeable or seems to have been a random decision by the A&R people at the time. OTOH most of the original or very early US pressings on Decca or Coral came my way through the internet, at least as long as it wasn't country LPs. But maybe I am biased with regard to my awareness of their catalog because MCA reissued a fair lot from their 50s Decca/Coral catalogs here in my formative collecting years in the the 70s. BTW, yes - TTK, I do think that your limited exposure to older Decca LPs may well be so because they had fewer artists that you would search actively for.

Wow, that sounds like a lot!

How many pages do they dedicate to Paul Gonsalves' rabble-rousing 27-chorus solo (on you know which tune)?

Yes, that's not impossible - see the following statement I made in my original post: "So I attributed this to someone having put a more recent vinyl pressing inside the original sleeve (was the original record shot, maybe?)." As I explained in a later post I did this myself in the case of the Mulligan/DEsmond LP on Verve. But in the case of the Impulse LPs evidence mentioned by others in this thread (and on Discogs) makes me believe this mismatch wasn't due to this reason but part of the sales practices, with an apparent (intentional or accidental?) overflow of covers printed beforehand and used up over time. A bit like in the case of other labels such as Blue Note and Capitol where it seems that during the 60s and possibly later U.S. covers were printed and shipped worldwide and then used with LPs pressed in the respective country. So you ended up with an LP that clearly had a comparatively thick U.S. cardboard cover but a vinyl marked "manufactured in West Germany", for example.