The playing is of an order that trancends recording quality. And I have a lot of cds where this is the case, I can really stomach bad sound for stellar performance.
This isn't one though where the sound stinks. I happen to think that Newman recordings like this are quite listenable. HighNote's reissues of the Onyx Newman stuff sound the best I have ever heard the material.
I am DEFINITELY not a huge Dylan music fan, I like his work with The Band and Blood on the Tracks and New Morning and that's about it, but I liked Tarantula, and I'm not much of a renter of videos or buyer of videos or dvds; I prefer to see films in the theater rather than watch them at home.
I may try to see this this weekend. Thanks for the info. I sort of EXPECT it to fall apart at the end!
I've read reviews of this film that call it a trainwreck. It still seems interesting to me as a concept and I've been trying to talk my wife into going to see it. . . I'm getting a little bit of success but someone called it "incoherent" and my wife likes films that cohere. . . .
Anyone have a report?
Yeah, I found that page, but not a link to a track listing (though I swear I looked at the Slim Gaillard discographical material last week but don't see it now; maybe I'm just not seeing things right!)
I couldn't find the track listings there either Mike.
However good ole Worlds Records comes through as usual. Try this link:
http://www.worldsrecords.com/cgi-bin/store...87&saved=artist
Nice stuff and I'll agree entirely as long as we also agree that there can be fundamentally solid "jazz" without even the blue feeling. . . . I find that to be the case from Storyville to Barbary Coast to Harlem to Juan-les-Pins to Gunther Schullerville. . . .
Yeah, look for artists: Hines, Rushing (James AND Jimmy!), Roy Eldridge, Buddy Tate and Jay McShann. I'm not sure all of these are Master Jazz recordings, but I think they are. . . .
I'm pretty much in the same boat with Tatum as you King U--though I only have the Group Masterpieces, but I've moved into Decca waters and have some of the transcription material. . .trying to steel myself for my eventual and inevitable epic journey into the Solo Masterpieces box. . . .
Yeah, I think a lot of critics don't get, never have gotten this music. I don't claim to myself yet, but I really don't even find cheeziness in some of the ones that are claimed to be cheezy. . .and I wish all the Impulses were in print on domestic cd. . . .
It's pretty amazing stuff as a body of work!
I agree with all the posters here. . . and Bev, is a "strong character" a GREAT thing? I work with a lot of "strong characters" (and some of them like BOTH kinds of music, country AND western!) that I wish worked elsewhere!
This weekend:
Blue Train RVG (I like it!)
Our Man in Paris RVG (KILLER!)
Bebop in Britain box
Pepper Adams: Urban Dreams
Jack Teagarden: King of the Blues Trombone
Thad Jones and the Danish Radio Orchestra
Dutch Jazz Orchestra: Portrait of a Silk Thread
The Peaceful Side of Billy Strayhorn (a reissue lp which in my opinion is NOT rechanneled stereo as the liner notes to the cd infer but real stereo)
some Randy Weston live boots
Bunny Berigan RCA sides
Washboard Kings (the series on Collector's Classics)
I don't disagree with anyone here, I just disagreed with the singular aspect of "THE" in the term "the fundamental."
There are a lot of great jazz performances and concepts that don't include the blues, and I appreciate the heck out of these as well.
I would NOT say that blues is the fundamental basis of jazz, personally. But I'm a big blues fan though crowded out by my obsession with jazz. Hendrix, Hooker and T-Bone head my blues list.