JazzMoose posted some interesting remarks in this thread about his judgement of Miles not being that essential or likeable (hope I'm not putting any words in your moose mouth here). I agree with that sentiment. Some people would like that explained. I have been asked before to do just that in an email exchange with Ubu. So here goes.
It's not easy to explain. It's like your guys having to explain why you DO like Miles's trumpet playing. Take a shot I'd say.
To put it very simply: I HATE his tone. 'nuff said if it were about any other artist. I fear that it is not that simple when Miles is concerned. I understand that an overwhelming public sees things differently, and so I'll try to put some more beef on the assesment.
To me, there isn't much to like. Once he stuffs that stuff in his horn, his tone becomes horrible to my ears. Way too fragile. He doesn't hold his notes but wavers around like a drunken man, hoping to hit the one that may fit where it belongs. Early in his (unmuted) carreer - BN albums come to mind - his tone was weak and his technique wasn't top-notch, but that didn't detract from the great music that was being played by those surrounding him. Later on, he specialised on this image (tone) of the vulnerable guy who understands the women or whatever. Even when not muted it started to sound like a stumbling baby.
I can understand that technique isn't the alpha and omega of all music, but to me the story that Miles is trying to tell suffers from a lack of technique BIG TIME. In my opinion his minimalistic approach demands that you have perfect control of the horn. I don't hear that. To me such an approach means you have to select the right tone at the right moment and it has to be perfectly phrased and perfectly timed. Miles falls short in ALL these in my humble opinion and for my tastes. Besides the fact that I find nothing pleasing in his tone, I am of the opinion that he not only selects the wrong notes to play, but plays them badly on top of that. Comparing his minimalism to that of Monk, Monk stars shines so brightly it becomes hard to listen to it. When Monk is the well dressed emperor, Miles is left without the clothes.
I understand that he has contributed a lot to the development of jazz music (though I am in no position to judge that). I am not talking about that, but about his playing.
Now it's your turn I'd say: what's so good about the guy's music that people seem to treat him as a demi-god or at least have him & his music as one of the main focal points of of their music collection?