jazzbo

There were about 102 total of the single discs, but no these box sets are not just groupings of the single discs. They are each three cd collections of material that MOSTLY are within the individual discs, but there are selections on each box set that do not appear on individual discs in the series. And each box set includes a large and thick beautiful booklet with album covers, hand bills, photographs, etc. The booklets are gorgeous!

I do think that counting "lurkers" the impact of these jazz boards is hard to estimate and easy to underestimate. . . . But I'm pretty much in agreement with Brandon, especially about these Time Life Spanish Blue Notes. I know several who will rebuy any US release of titles they did not have before except in the Spanish version. If for no other reason than. . . those all blue covers are hard to take long term!

Those Davis ones look so cool. . . . Thanks for posting John.

I bet it happens. Maybe not right away, but I bet it happens.

Yup. Keep 'em flying!

There ya go. Keep 'em flying.

Hmmmm. . . on second thought WHO KNOWS if this would be on the possible Mosaic; depends if they do a Quartet Mosaic or a plain ole RCA Burton Mosaic. It's well worth getting in either case.

You're right Tom, not out on cd in the USA. This does mean that there is a shift from the original concept of the RVG series USA, and a good shift too!

IF they do a Mosaic, that would be a part of it. It's a FINE album!

Indeed!

I went with First Meditations, though it just barely edged out Sun Ship. Sun Ship hits my head hard, First Meditations hits my heart.

Alright! A color cover image! AN UGLY ONE, but. . . .

I'm happy about all these because I really dig the RVG Edition sound. Seems that the intent of the series has changed from offering remastered staples from the label to just offering remastered versions of almost anything on the label and I'm not complaining!

MrJazz: I did not know that! Thanks for sharing! I'm sure many of us would be interested in any stories about your dad you'd like to share in a thread somewhere!

No, not officially. . . . There is one two cd set within the box that is from 1974 I believe, the rest are from the eighties and up. . . . Good stuff from a period of Miles I'm not that keen of overall. Probably in time they'll appear individually from Sony or Warners or SOMEONE. I mean. . . if there's a dollar to be made on Miles someone will be making it over the next hundred years or so. . . .

Kirk at Montreux!

Those eighties Miles appearances in the box set are among the best eighties Miles I've heard. . . .

Thanks Alexander. Interesting choices they made. . . .

Don't overdo it! Ah what the heck, overdo it. . . you'r TWENTY FOUR!

Wow, I'm looking forward to the expanded Condon and the Hall!

Yeah, well put. I went to college at the U of C and I didn't fail to notice Chicago in the film. BUT. . . I always sort of felt that Chicago WAS Gotham City!

MLK.

I'm a little less impressed by the film, but it was probably the very best Batman film (I really don't have high expectations for Batman films!) I could have done without Katie Holmes entirely. But I did like the Al Ghoul and Scarecrow appearances. Tell me, learned experts, does this redefining the myth align itself with the Year One comic version (i. e. was the League of Shadows part of it, was Al Ghoul the trainer, was Rachel a character?) I've never read the comic version. I quit reading Batman when Giordano was inking it and I read the first Dark Knight graphic novel and that was it.

As the prophet has said, "Grant Green selleth more."

I fall sort of in between Mark and Alexander in my comic book fandom and desire to see the movie-ization of a comic. When I was seven or so in 1962 or so the Marvels started to take off: FF and Spidey and my real favorites: Journey into Mystery and Strange Tales. My father forbade me to read this stuff which was a mistake because I managed to find a lot of them and hide them in my room, Finally a few years later my dad told me I could collect some if I wanted and he came in the next day to my room and saw a two foot stack! And then moving to Africa in 1966 I was afraid I would not find the comics I was addicted to, but in Addis Ababa there was one English book store, Giannopolis and eventually the comics would appear from Europe or occasionally from the US. In Swaziland there was a store I could get them all. It was really weird to read some of these very Amerian cultural pieces in the middle of a multiracial and multinational dorm room in M'Babane. I do feel that the comic book experience at heart is very noncinematic, it's all your personal imagination at play along with the framework offered on the newsprint pages (I quit comics when they got all slick and such, not because of that but because I was in my early twenties and had to learn how to spend time in reality!) To my way of thinking the first movies along the comic book line were juste laughingly bad. Superman, etc. Sheesh. I hated that. But technology came along and the movies got better, and directors came along that really wanted to do comic book movies because they loved the material, and that didn't hurt. The best ones really communicated the love of the material and came up with interesting comic book movies. I never felt they were in fact MY versions. For the most part only a few actually were rooted in the comics that I read and enjoyed. But I could view them as someone's version that they wanted to share, and that was fun. So Xmen, Spidey, Hulk, Daredevil, Elektra--I enjoy these. I'm eager to see Batman Begins and Fantastic Four! I'll probably skip Ghost Rider with Nicholas Cage. . .