Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Who needs an assault weapon to kill somebody? If the guy had his mind set on it as much as he obviously did, he would have found a way to carry out his plan no matter what kind of weapons he would have had to resort to.

bullshit.jpg

I didn't realizing killing came about with the advent of the gun.

Bottom line is this, gents. You can make guns illegal.

Just like we did with drugs. Boy, that worked out swimmingly, didn't it?

Besides, how many guns that are used in criminal acts do you actually think were legally obtained?

  • Replies 193
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Who needs an assault weapon to kill somebody? If the guy had his mind set on it as much as he obviously did, he would have found a way to carry out his plan no matter what kind of weapons he would have had to resort to.

bullshit.jpg

I didn't realizing killing came about with the advent of the gun.

Bottom line is this, gents. You can make guns illegal.

Just like we did with drugs. Boy, that worked out swimmingly, didn't it?

Besides, how many guns that are used in criminal acts do you actually think were legally obtained?

Boy are you correct! Can't imagine what I was thinking. Steal legal guns, steal illegal guns. No better source for guns of any kind than the USA. Our government even sells them to our friends/don't knows/bad guys/enemies.

While basking in the glory of a positive nessa post, stick it where the sun don't shine.

Posted (edited)

You can do it with any of the above. A skilled operator can fire a lever-action quicker than a semi-auto. Same goes with a revolver.

Sounds like a good case for gun control to me.

No problem, as long as honest law-abiding citizens can still own (certain types of) firearms.

Guy

Edited by Guy
Posted

They just interviewed a girl who was in the classroom which was assaulted on TV. She played dead to escape. The murderer had a handgun.

Posted

I didn't realizing killing came about with the advent of the gun.

You gotta be kiddin' me Scott. That's some jive ass shit right there.

No, what's jive shit is you spouting on about gun control laws not taking into account the average gun owner is responsible about their ownership/hobby/etc., while most of the guns used in criminl activities are illegally obtained.

You're also completely ignoring that making something illegal almost never makes it go away. The same would happen with guns.

If somebody wants one bad enough, they'll get it. Violent personalities were around long before guns were invented, and will be around long after we're gone.

If you can't state anything more tangible than "smells like bullshit" or tell me that my comments are "jive ass" your rebuttals really won't hold much water.

You make it seem as though having tighter gun control would prevent things like this from happening. Now that's what I call jive ass. And naive as hell to boot.

Posted

What I can never understand, in instances of killers such as this, is how a person loses track of empathizing with other people. To not have any consideration for the pain being inflicted on others by one's actions is the terrifying hallmark of insanity.

The ripple effect of just one wrongful death is so powerful, 33 bright lives lost sends an awful wave which spans the coasts. We all sympathize with the families who have lost a loved one, we universally despise the murderer responsible. One can only come to the conclusion that the even more horrifying effects of a war in which thousands are killed must be exponentially worse.

Wasn't it Chris Rock who said bullets should cost $1000 each?

Posted (edited)

You're also completely ignoring that making something illegal almost never makes it go away. The same would happen with guns.

...

You make it seem as though having tighter gun control would prevent things like this from happening. Now that's what I call jive ass. And naive as hell to boot.

It wouldn't prevent things like this from happening, but it would probably reduce their frequency. (Not a judgment on the moral merit of various gun control laws.)

Anyway, I'm done here for the next few days... too early to turn a tragedy into a political football.

Guy

Edited by Guy
Posted

So if the "jilted lover" narrative, or angle, turns out to be partly behind this case... you know, I'm so sick of my gender doing crap like this. 99 out of 100 times it's a man who goes on a g.d. shooting rampage. Can't we teach ourselves to be strong without encouraging the psychopathic-aggressive insanity that leads to things like this?

Posted (edited)

You're also completely ignoring that making something illegal almost never makes it go away. The same would happen with guns.

...

You make it seem as though having tighter gun control would prevent things like this from happening. Now that's what I call jive ass. And naive as hell to boot.

It wouldn't prevent things like this from happening, but it would probably reduce their frequency. (Not a judgment on the moral merit of various gun control laws.)

Anyway, I'm done here for the next few days... too early to turn a tragedy into a political football.

Guy

I completely agree.

Scott, surely you see the flaws in your original argument:

If the guy had his mind set on it as much as he obviously did, he would have found out a way to carry out his plan no matter what kind of weapons he would have had to resort to.

Do you really think that he could have killed over 30 people so easily without resorting to firearms? Yes, I suppose that he could have constructed a bomb or committed arson, but I think that would have taken a lot more effort and planning. Maybe, then, he would have just killed himself alone and let everyone else be.

Moreover, by this train of reasoning, could you not also argue that we should not restrict shoulder-launched SAM's because if someone is really intent on bringing down a plane they will find a way to do it? The whole point of gun control is to make it more difficult for some people to acquire firearms (as well as forbid civilian ownership of certain weapons altogether).

On another note, the distinction drawn between "assault" style and other weapons is meaningless. The important things to consider are the range of the weapon and its ability to penetrate (body armor, bulletproof glass, etc.). The family of a peace officer who is killed at long range by a bolt-action rifle (I have a friend in the OC Sheriff's Department who knew someone who was murdered in such a manner by someone with a "regular" hunting rifle) certainly is not consoled by the ban on assault-style weapons.

Yes, I know that handguns, not rifles, were used to commit this atrocity. Also, for the record, I do believe that the ownership of certain types of firearms (for self-protection purposes) is provided by the Constitution.

At any rate, I have said too much already - as Guy noted, it is far too soon for all of this.

Edited by Edward
Posted

Horrible, horrible news. My condolences to the families

Please don't be stupid and argue about the type of gun. They are dead! Talk to the mothers and fathers and wives and sisters and brothers and cousins and......................................

I agree. Politicizing this event is pointless and rather tasteless. If people want to make this massacre a part of their political agenda, I'd advise them to at least wait until the dead are buried.

Posted

Yes, I suppose that he could have constructed a bomb or committed arson, but I think that would have taken a lot more effort and planning.

So my argument isn't flawed at all.

It may not have been as easy, but I think it's pretty obvious when somebody has reached this mental state there are few obstacles.

Would you not agree?

Posted

Horrible, horrible news. My condolences to the families

Please don't be stupid and argue about the type of gun. They are dead! Talk to the mothers and fathers and wives and sisters and brothers and cousins and......................................

I agree. Politicizing this event is pointless and rather tasteless. If people want to make this massacre a part of their political agenda, I'd advise them to at least wait until the dead are buried.

I too agree with these points.

A sad day for anyone touched by this.

Posted

Anyway, I'm done here for the next few days... too early to turn a tragedy into a political football.

At any rate, I have said too much already - as Guy noted, it is far too soon for all of this.

Politicizing this event is pointless and rather tasteless.

Agreed.

But, to put a cleaner point on my argument, I have never, and will never, own a gun. I don't believe in them. I have no political agenda when it comes to this. I was simply trying to equalize some of the points made earlier in this thread.

If I have offended, I apologize.

Posted

Race may have been a factor. I have no idea if the Chinese are more or less racist than anybody else. The current report is that the man originally identified as the former girlfriend's "advisor" who was shot in the dorm room with the former girlfriend is now being identified as her new love interest. He is a black male named Ryan Clark.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2007170635,00.html

Posted

Race may have been a factor. I have no idea if the Chinese are more or less racist than anybody else.

I dunno.....but if you're a white dude who happens to plant a few too many fun luvin' pecks on the cheek of some Indian film gal, they start going off the rails.

Protestors in India Burn Richard Gere Effigies

Fiery Reaction to Actor's Embrace of Bollywood Star

By PRITHWISH GANGULY, Reuters

NEW DELHI (April 16) - Richard Gere 's repeated kisses on the cheeks of Bollywood actress Shilpa Shetty in an event to promote AIDS awareness sparked protests in India on Monday with demonstrators burning effigies of the actors.

'This Is a Bit Too Much'

Footage of the Hollywood star sweeping Shetty backwards in a dramatic embrace at the Sunday night event in New Delhi was repeatedly aired on news channels on Monday.

Many saw the act as an outrage against Shetty's modesty and Indian culture, though Shetty herself angrily dismissed the protests as an "over-reaction" that made India look silly.

Groups of men burned and kicked effigies of the actors in protests across India, including in the northern Indian cities of New Delhi, Kanpur, Meerut and Varanasi as well as in the central city of Indore.

Some called for the actors' deaths. Others wanted public apologies.

But Shetty, the winner of the "Celebrity Big Brother" reality TV show in Britain this year, said the reaction to the kiss made India look "regressive."

"I admit it went a little overboard but that was not the intention," she said to a crowd of journalists and protesters that had besieged her film set in Mumbai on Monday evening.

"He did not do anything obscene," she said of Gere, adding that they had since spoken on the phone. "He apologized to me and told me to tell the media that he apologized."

She said Gere was only re-enacting his moves from the film "Shall We Dance" to entertain the audience and communicate in a Bollywood style as he did not speak Hindi.

The clinch between the two stars had originally gone down well when it happened onstage at an event on Sunday night to encourage truckers -- seen as a high-risk group in India's fight against AIDS -- to wear condoms during sex.

They whooped with delight and whistled loudly as Gere swooped down on a visibly delighted Shetty to kiss her on her hand and a number of times on one side of her face.

"No condom, no sex," an ebullient 58-year-old Gere shouted in Hindi to thousands of truck drivers who roared his words back in unison at a dusty fairground in New Delhi.

Indian authorities have been focusing on high-risk groups such as truckers, who have helped spread the virus across the country as many of them have sex with prostitutes during their journeys and infect their wives back home.

Posted

This is so fucking sad and disturbing. The newest accounts suggest that this kid did in fact make a number of bomb threats. More important is that he bought one gun, waited thirty days to buy a second one (legally) and then went on a rampage. So this was pre-meditated at pretty much every level. It is so hard to know what goes through people's minds, but you have to be totally sick and basically devoid of normal human emotions to be able to plan to murder dozens of people.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...