-
Posts
5,960 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Donations
0.00 USD
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by bertrand
-
Yes, I always thought it was Jack McDuff LOL. Logically, they would have played the Beatles tune in support of the album, so that suggests Green and Young playing together in the summer of 1965. As I pointed out though, Grant Left Blue Note almost overnight after the Hold Your Hand record (3/31/65) since he made King Funk on 5/26/65. The Blue Note record must have been a 'last fulfillment before the contract ends' kind of deal. Would Verve had wanted him to plug a Blue Note album on gigs? They were probably not paying attention. The issue of the date is not just an academic exercise. If the Iron City tape had just turned up yesterday, which label would need to give clearance? If it was before 3/31/65 (as Travis Klein suggests) then it is Blue Note. After that it is Verve for a while, but that contract ended at some point. Does Grant appear as 'courtesy of' on any sideman date between his two Blue Note leader stints? If it is really 1967 as Cobblestone claimed, then no clearance was needed. But maybe they just claimed that date to bypass Blue Note or Verve... The issue of contracts fascinates me. If a recording turns up, how does one know if there was an enforceable contract in action on the day of the recording. This Grant situation would really be a test. Let's say a recording turns up of Grant that can be 100% guaranteed to have been made on 4/15/65. Who needs to give clearance? Blue Note or Verve? What if it is released anyway and one of the labels takes action. They would need to produce an authentic contract with Grant's signature. Does Blue Note have an archive of all the contracts from back in those days? I doubt Verve does - they apparently can't even find the tapes from the later Green sessions. Another example: I was given a lo-fi Lee Morgan recording from November 1971 and asked if a label could be interested. I assumed Blue Note but then realized that his last leader/sideman date for Blue Note was before that, so it was THEORETICALLY possible that his contract had ended and not been renewed, which I knew was highly unlikely. Then I saw that Lee is listed as 'courtesy of Blue Note' on the Charles Earland record so that was proof enough for me and I made Blue Note aware of it thought Zev Feldman, who is apparently now their go-to guy now - no answer yet, but it is very lo-fi, not holding my breath. If it was a no but another label was interested in putting it out at least as download (which is really the solution here), they would need clearance from Blue Note. If they bypass Blue Note, then they could get sued. But does Blue Note have a contract to produce? Is the note on the Earland record enough proof? There is one other clue that I am not sure I am allowed to disclose yet, but it is weaker than the Earland angle. Going back to Grant - if Uptown had put out the 7/31/66 Left Bank date, would they have needed clearance from a label? My hunch is no, we have no reason to believe Grant was under contract with anyone. It seems it was really more Patton's gig in support of Got A Good Thing Goin', but I guess they wanted Grant because he was more of a name. Uptown would not have cared anyway - he put out the Duke Pearson big band date from 4/27/69, and Duke was still doing leader dates for Blue Note after that, although not the big band, but I am sure it was one contract covering any configurations.
-
I think you found the Iron City gig, but it is Ben Dixon on drums. Or is that up in the air also?
-
Interesting that the photo with Larry might be 6/17/66. Remember that Grant was at Left Bank on 7/31/66 with Vick, Patton and Hugh Walker. This would mean he really did go back and forth. It was recorded, Uptown bought the tape and it is sitting in some storage unit in Montreal. I tried talking him into putting it out several times, but he didn't and now who knows what will happen...
-
Great job Niko and Roberto!!! 1) Ed Cherry is now on the fence. Bill Heid brought it up two years ago when I last saw him and was adamant it could NOT be Larry. I will follow up. 2) 1/18/65 has no personnel listed. But it can't be Larry, he was in Paris. 3) Totally possible that Travis got the January and November gigs confused. November is a possible candidate, with Larry subbing for John at the last minute. It is the only one with Dixon. Only hitch: the Verve session is before so that makes the song title issue problematic. 4) The later dates are more doubtful - Larry was in another bag by then. The Cobblestone did claim 1967, but that might have been made up to avoid negotiating with a label. In 1967, Grant had no label, but in 1965 it was Blue Note then Verve. Odd that he switched labels so fast. Datewise, it seems to be Patton. But Patton and Dixon say it is Young. And more people think Larry than John. Anyone want to give some specific examples? For me, the Love Supreme vamp points to Larry, although Grant starts it! Early 1965 is doubtful because of the vamp. More work is needed. Would be nice to get the scoop on the photo. I plan to get a newspapers.com account, long overdue. Niko, do you have the $8/month or $20/month option? Sounds like the upgrade gives you a lot more. How long did that search take? Do you have to go Newspaper by newspaper, there is no central search engine? During the 7 day free trial, I plan to test these four obscure heroes of mine: Booker Little, Herbie Nichols, Tina Brooks and Larry Young.
-
Wow! So it was at this very gig that the seed of the idea to record the Beatles' tune was planted in Grant's head. Amazing! Do you remember who else was in the band? And, the big question: any chance anyone was recording? So we know Grant was at the club several times. It still needs to be determined if Larry Young was ever on any of the gigs. It is the only way he could have been on Iron City.
-
Would they really have been playing the Love Supreme vamp on 1/18/65? The Coltrane was record was 5 weeks old...
-
Time to dig this up again. I am in touch with British researcher David Grundy who is writing an article on Larry Young for the publication Point of Departure. He was not aware of the Iron City debate, so I hipped him. This made me want to go back and dig some more. I found Travis Klein on Facebook, the person who arranged the record date while Grant was playing at the Hurricane Lounge. He regularly posts historical music facts about Pittsburgh and said this: On this date in Pittsburgh music history, January 18, 1965, Grant Green with his trio, Ben Dixon on drums and the monster "Big" John Patton on Hammond B-3 organ, appeared at the Hurricane Lounge in the 1500 block of Center Avenue on the Hill. One of the biggest thrills in my life happened that day. Billy Driscoll, who was managing Gene Ludwig at the time, came up to our store at 1811 Center and told me that Grant needed money to cop drugs and he would be willing to trade a recording session for the money. I immediately called down to Gateway Studios, owned by the the Shapiro's of National Record Mart and located above their main location at 234 Forbes Avenue to arrange for the recording session. The songs on the album are "Samba de Orpheus", "Old Man Moses" (Let My People Go), "High Heeled Sneakers", "Motherless Child", "Work Song" and an untitled number that I named "Iron City" and became the name of the album. So great, we have a date. All good, right? Think again. Larry was in Paris on that date! So where do we stand? 1) Patton said it was not him but Larry, and Ben Dixon thought so as well. 2) Many people hear Larry, but experts like Bill Heid and Ed Cherry say it is Patton. 3) Is this date correct? Grant may have played several times at this joint, in fact I found another post where DMP suggests he saw Grant there in 1967 with Patton. How can this be settled? Can we find reviews or gig listings in Newspapers? If there is at least one example of Larry playing at the Lounge with Grant, then it is still possible. Travis could be thinking of two different appearances, perhaps? What is odd is that Travis showed up for part of the session, yet cannot say who was at the session on organ. Very odd... One thing for sure: Larry could not have been in Pittsburgh on 1/18/65.
-
You saw Grant Green at the Hurricane in 1967 or 1965 or both?
-
Hasaan Ibn Ali – Metaphysics: The Lost Atlantic Album
bertrand replied to king ubu's topic in New Releases
Sound is fine. Odean sounds a bit harsh, but he was young and still working on his sound. The comparison to Andrew!!! is very apt. So other than Elmo Hope, who was he listening to? I would say Hill definitely. I would speculate Herbie Nichols, but how would he have gotten the records, unless Max hooked him up...- 103 replies
-
- hasaan
- hasaan ibn ali
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
I usually don't do this, but I preordered the Redman from Dusty Groove because it's Dewey and probably the only time it will ever be on CD (I assume these are real CDs). Shipping seems to be $3 for a preorder, is that correct?
-
How much is shipping from this site?
-
Thanks!
-
Hasaan Ibn Ali – Metaphysics: The Lost Atlantic Album
bertrand replied to king ubu's topic in New Releases
Try contacting Cheryl Pawelski through Facebook maybe?- 103 replies
-
- hasaan
- hasaan ibn ali
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Bumping this up - does anyone have a copy of the article by Guy Sterling in the Newark Star Ledger - it is not online. Thanks!
-
Not everything was destroyed in the fire, but it did not even occur to me that could have been why the rest of the concert never came out. It seems that was not the reason in the end, or were these tracks sitting in the same closet in which the Hasaan acetate was hiding
-
Recent research Teddy Charles, Chet Baker, etc.
bertrand replied to JamesAHarrod's topic in Discography
Is there a collection of Teddy Charles' papers somewhere?- 3 replies
-
- teddy charles
- jack wilson
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Duh, I missed the Chicago part. Yup, skipping that one also.
-
Hasaan Ibn Ali – Metaphysics: The Lost Atlantic Album
bertrand replied to king ubu's topic in New Releases
Correction - a whole piano introduction is missing. That makes more sense, but track 10 seems to start with a fade-in.- 103 replies
-
- hasaan
- hasaan ibn ali
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Was the Ayler session never released at all, or just not with that cover? It seems the title was Spirits, which does not really narrow it down, that was the title he used for several of his records PS: I guess it is the one I have on a Black Lion CD.
-
Hasaan Ibn Ali – Metaphysics: The Lost Atlantic Album
bertrand replied to king ubu's topic in New Releases
Are the first couple of notes from the short version of Atlantic Ones (last track) missing? Probably part of the sloppy transfer job that missed an entire song. Not a big deal, just curious. Glad they included it anyway.- 103 replies
-
- hasaan
- hasaan ibn ali
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hasaan Ibn Ali – Metaphysics: The Lost Atlantic Album
bertrand replied to king ubu's topic in New Releases
I keep hearing that hearing Elmo Hope's music, and presumably discussions with him, was what help Hasaan really figure out where he wanted to go. Do you hear it in the music?- 103 replies
-
- hasaan
- hasaan ibn ali
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Been wondering for years when this would come out. No-brainer for me. What's the 16-CD set? All Mingus?
-
Hasaan Ibn Ali – Metaphysics: The Lost Atlantic Album
bertrand replied to king ubu's topic in New Releases
but it really has also been overhyped IMO. Just be thankful it wasn't put out by Resonance- 103 replies
-
- hasaan
- hasaan ibn ali
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Bonus tracks exist for the Redman.
-
I am very honored that I was invited by Robert Shahid at WEAA in Baltimore to discuss the new Freddie Redd and Butch Warren releases on his show Masterclass. This will be from noon to 1PM EST on Tuesday 4/27, the link is below. Hope you can tune in! Bertrand. WEAA | The Voice of the Community
_forumlogo.png.a607ef20a6e0c299ab2aa6443aa1f32e.png)