Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, felser said:

Not in love with it - anyone want to make a deal for it?  I will say that Bonnie Herman is a great singer, and this contains 14 albums on seven CD's.

Magic Voices on Spotify

 

Edited by felser
Posted
14 hours ago, Chuck Nessa said:

I've been listening to this again too.

Was led back to the Oliver sides by Thomas Brothers' recent Armstrong bio "Louis Armstrong: Master of Modernism" -- second volume, takes us from Oliver to the early '30s,  of what promises to be a multi-volume work. Pretty good so far, certainly better than the Teachout and Bergreen's bios. Scholarly but not off-puttingly so, it play the race cardd a bit too much for my taste. Without doubt racism played a big role in shaping Armstrong's life/career, but was contending with it at the heart of his musical greatness? I also didn't care for the putdown of the Fletcher Henderson  Orch. as a "dicty" outfit, shaped by a desire to emulate white bands. I listened to some early Henderson alongside contemporary sides by Isham Jones. and Henderson didn't sound very dicty to me. I felt that Brothers just wanted to put down the so-called "talented tenth" and the sort of music that he thought represented their approach to life. 

BTW, I've long wondered about the relationship in semi-pure musical terms, plasticity of rhythm and phrasing especially and thus sheer swing, between the great country blues singers and early jazz. Of course if you're working with just a guitar and your own voice rather than a wind instrument, you have more control over the final results, but I'd say Charlie Patton or, to skip ahead some ways, Robert Johnson arguably  were more "advanced" in those aforementioned respects, plasticity of rhythm/ohrasing,  than all but Bechet and Armstrong. Or does it make no sense to make such comparisons? Also what of the playing in those respects of the great stride pianists? No, it's not a race, but who in effect was "ahead," what fed on what, if you bring, say, James P. Johnson into the picture? Or, to switch things around, Bessie Smith? ?

Posted
2 hours ago, Larry Kart said:

Was led back to the Oliver sides by Thomas Brothers' recent Armstrong bio "Louis Armstrong: Master of Modernism" -- second volume, takes us from Oliver to the early '30s,  of what promises to be a multi-volume work. Pretty good so far, certainly better than the Teachout and Bergreen's bios. Scholarly but not off-puttingly so, it play the race cardd a bit too much for my taste. Without doubt racism played a big role in shaping Armstrong's life/career, but was contending with it at the heart of his musical greatness? I also didn't care for the putdown of the Fletcher Henderson  Orch. as a "dicty" outfit, shaped by a desire to emulate white bands. I listened to some early Henderson alongside contemporary sides by Isham Jones. and Henderson didn't sound very dicty to me. I felt that Brothers just wanted to put down the so-called "talented tenth" and the sort of music that he thought represented their approach to life.

I've also been revisiting this 3 disc set -

NTUtNzkxMi5qcGVn.jpeg

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Chuck Nessa said:

I've also been revisiting this 3 disc set -

NTUtNzkxMi5qcGVn.jpeg

 

great minds - I have been listening to this same CD this week for a New Orleans project I am working on.

4 hours ago, Larry Kart said:

Was led back to the Oliver sides by Thomas Brothers' recent Armstrong bio "Louis Armstrong: Master of Modernism" -- second volume, takes us from Oliver to the early '30s,  of what promises to be a multi-volume work. Pretty good so far, certainly better than the Teachout and Bergreen's bios. Scholarly but not off-puttingly so, it play the race cardd a bit too much for my taste. Without doubt racism played a big role in shaping Armstrong's life/career, but was contending with it at the heart of his musical greatness? I also didn't care for the putdown of the Fletcher Henderson  Orch. as a "dicty" outfit, shaped by a desire to emulate white bands. I listened to some early Henderson alongside contemporary sides by Isham Jones. and Henderson didn't sound very dicty to me. I felt that Brothers just wanted to put down the so-called "talented tenth" and the sort of music that he thought represented their approach to life. 

BTW, I've long wondered about the relationship in semi-pure musical terms, plasticity of rhythm and phrasing especially and thus sheer swing, between the great country blues singers and early jazz. Of course if you're working with just a guitar and your own voice rather than a wind instrument, you have more control over the final results, but I'd say Charlie Patton or, to skip ahead some ways, Robert Johnson arguably  were more "advanced" in those aforementioned respects, plasticity of rhythm/ohrasing,  than all but Bechet and Armstrong. Or does it make no sense to make such comparisons? Also what of the playing in those respects of the great stride pianists? No, it's not a race, but who in effect was "ahead," what fed on what, if you bring, say, James P. Johnson into the picture? Or, to switch things around, Bessie Smith? ?

the difficulty in figuring all of this out is that there are so few true early black bands that recorded - and when they did record early on they usually could not use actual drums because of the limits of early technology - on the other hand (and this is probably an unpopular suggestion) listen the the Original Dixieland Jazz Band, which did have drums, and imagine, probably correctly, that they were doing what black bands were doing - or listen to James Reese Europe, whose drummer Buddy Gilmore was swinging like mad on some of those 1913 recordings.  As for stride, yes, important, but notice how radically different James P.'s time is, compared to his playing before and after Armstrong.

As for Patton and his ilk, these guys were regularly playing for dancers, and time was everything. And I agree they really swung, if in a somewhat different way than jazz musicians.

Check this out:

 

and:

 

Edited by AllenLowe
Posted
2 hours ago, AllenLowe said:

great minds - I have been listening to this same CD this week for a New Orleans project I am working on.

the difficulty in figuring all of this out is that there are so few true early black bands that recorded - and when they did record early on they usually could not use actual drums because of the limits of early technology - on the other hand (and this is probably an unpopular suggestion) listen the the Original Dixieland Jazz Band, which did have drums, and imagine, probably correctly, that they were doing what black bands were doing - or listen to James Reese Europe, whose drummer Buddy Gilmore was swinging like mad on some of those 1913 recordings.  As for stride, yes, important, but notice how radically different James P.'s time is, compared to his playing before and after Armstrong.

As for Patton and his ilk, these guys were regularly playing for dancers, and time was everything. And I agree they really swung, if in a somewhat different way than jazz musicians.

Check this out:

 

and:

 

Down Home Rag  -- wow! The drive is fabulous but is it really swinging, in that it's all  breathless drive, little or no relaxation? Recommend some Reese Europe CDs, please.

Posted
2 hours ago, Larry Kart said:

Down Home Rag  -- wow! The drive is fabulous but is it really swinging, in that it's all  breathless drive, little or no relaxation? Recommend some Reese Europe CDs, please.

well, it's an early idea of swing - interviews with early New Orleans players tend to describe the early idea of jazz as speeding things up - this is the best sounding Europe CD, I think:

https://www.amazon.com/Product-Our-Souls-Europes-Orchestra/dp/B07DW38S4F/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2J9MB2PAZFTP5&keywords=james+reese+europe&qid=1679018445&s=music&sprefix=james+reese+europe%2Cpopular%2C93&sr=1-1

Posted (edited)

I regurlarly play random track from this Ellington box set

https://www.discogs.com/fr/release/7759958-Duke-Ellington-Anniversary-13-Volumes-Box-Set

The box set contains 13 CDs. It was compiled by Claude Carriere. Covers the 1920s-1940s

While I have all the material on other compilations (Mosaic etc), I like to listen to this set as it avoids the lesser interesting tracks or alternates included in most other collections (i would not do without them but those tracks don’t require repeated listening ).

Edited by hopkins
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 4/8/2023 at 8:29 PM, T.D. said:

My5qcGVn.jpeg

 Recently binged on some of the Widow’s Taste releases that Laurie Pepper put out and thought about wanting to revisit this very set.

Right now, discs 14 and 15 of the Herbie Hancock Columbia box, which include all of the material from this album and its followup. 

image.jpeg.b64d7bee9a4fd71f44601316feeff4aa.jpeg

A lot of stylistic breadth to this Hancock Columbia set, which encompasses everything from the Mwandishi and Headhunter bands to VSOP and Future Shock.

Edited by ghost of miles
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Disc one of

Alan Skidmore — — A Supreme Love——( Confront)

Newly arrived six disc retrospective from Skid’s personal archive, mostly unreleased. Disc one has some tasty cuts his Dad, Humph, Alexis Korner, Dave Holland , Kenny Wheeler a.o. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...