What Lester has posted is not supposed to be historical research with citations but informational.
Now, here's the question: has anything he's posted been factually incorrect? If so, then a correction is warranted. If not, then this conversation seems to be over. If it's a matter of interpretation, again that's his interpretation.
If I were Lester or somebody else who wanted to post some information here, after getting the reception that he did, why would I bother. If that is the case, who is harmed? All of us, it would seem.